Categories
Filmmakers

Book Interview: David Fincher — Mind Games

David Fincher - Mind Games

Publisher: Abrams Books

Release Date: November 23, 2021

A Conversation with Adam Nayman

David Fincher: Mind Games” is the third in a series of three books (The Coen Brothers: This Book Really Ties the Films Together and Paul Thomas Anderson: Masterworks are the other two) that focuses on various contemporary auteurs. His latest is the most significant book currently available that offers any sort of “definitive critical and visual survey of the incredible works” of David Fincher. It discusses each of his features — including Alien 3, Se7en, The Game, Fight Club, Panic Room, Zodiac, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, The Social Network, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Gone Girl, and Mank — but also discusses other works such as various commercials, music videos, and especially House of Cards and Mindhunter. Each chapter weaves production history with original critical analysis and is beautifully illustrated with behind-the-scenes photography, still-frames, and original illustrations. Better yet, Mind Games also features interviews with Fincher’s frequent collaborators — including Jeff Cronenweth, Angus Wall, Laray Mayfield, Holt McCallany, Howard Shore and Erik Messerschmidt. One of the more interesting aspects of this text is that Adam Nayman eschews a chronological approach in favor of grouping Fincher’s films around “themes of procedure, imprisonment, paranoia, prestige, and relationship dynamics.” The marketing materials claim that the book is “styled as an investigation into a filmmaker obsessed with investigation,” and that is a pretty deft way to sum it up. The director’s fanbase is certain to find the book an essential addition to their bookshelves.

In addition to The Coen Brothers: This Book Really Ties the Films Together and Paul Thomas Anderson: Masterworks, Adam Nayman is a contributing editor to Cinema Scope. Needless to say, we are honored that he agreed to discuss this excellent new book with us.

DavidFincherMindGames_p270b

CL: Thanks for taking the time to discuss your new book with us during these busy days! Could you tell us how it all began for you? When did you first become interested in cinema, and how did you begin writing about it?

AN: I grew up in a household filled with books by Pauline Kael. My mother Evelyne is a movie fan and instilled a passion for cinema as well as for cinema appreciation. By the time I was eleven or twelve, I’d inhaled a decade’s worth of Roger Ebert ‘Movie Yearbooks’ and moved on to Danny Peary’s ‘Cult Movies’ guides. I also picked up used copies of ‘Midnight Movies’ and ‘Cronenberg on Cronenberg’ and started trying to write my own reviews, diaristically, but in a similar vein. In seventh grade, I convinced my teacher to let me do a collection of movie reviews as an independent assignment and turned it in with pride. She couldn’t believe how many of the movies in there were things she hadn’t seen or heard of. In high school, I volunteered to review movies for my school paper and did the same in university, after which I bridged into professional work.

CL: You’ve written about so many different directors. Does any particular filmmaker stand out as your favorite of all time? Who has made the biggest impression on you?

AN: I think the answer to that question changes over time, but it’s not as if each new candidate cancels out their predecessor. The first movie to completely hold me in any kind of thoughtful, grown-up way was The Manchurian Candidate, and the way John Frankenheimer synthesized horror and drama with satire made an indelible impression on me. I’m always interested in anything that feels hallucinatory in the same purposeful, deconstructable way. After that, in my teens, I think the filmmakers who captured my imagination most were the ones who went to different kinds of extremes — not only Lynch and Cronenberg (who offered illicit, intellectual stimulation) but also long, slow, spacious minimalism: I cottoned on to Tarkovsky and Tarr. My favorite living, working filmmaker is Claire Denis, for her boldness and refusal of categories, and obviously I’m fond of the directors I’ve written books on as well — the Coens most of all, for some of the same reasons I loved The Manchurian Candidate (and I wish they would remake it).

CL: Is there a single film that is of special importance for you?

AN: The answer to this question will always be Jaws. The reasons are pretty much self-evident, but one bit of context I’ll offer is that it was the first time I remember my mother hesitating before letting me watch something; that little hesitation, and the excitement of her going through with it as the cassette slid into the VCR, is one of the great memories of my childhood.

CL: Those paying attention might notice that this new book about David Fincher follows two similar volumes about the work of various auteurs. How was this series born — or were these books even conceived of as a series? How do you choose which filmmakers to cover?

AN: The Coens book came out of a very spontaneous and fortunate series of circumstances made possible by my connection to the UK film magazine “Little White Lies.” The series was born out of a relationship between LWL and the US publisher Abrams, specifically between two guys in London — David Jenkins and Clive Wilson — and an editor in New York named Eric Klopfer. The concept was always a kind of thorough, essayistic “auteurist” overview that melded big-format pictorial criticism. While it took a while to figure out the flow, the layout, and the relationships between images and text, it came together really well, and did really well. The Anderson book was a logical sequel that constituted a challenge insofar as I’m more ambivalent about the filmmaker — a fan, for sure, but with reservations that I don’t have about the Coens. Fincher represents an even deeper level of ambivalence, which means that the books keep getting harder even though certain features of the format — and the workflow — are the same.

CL:  That’s interesting because each of the books inspire an enthusiastic appreciation for the filmmakers and their work. How do these volumes differ from similar books?

AN: That’s not for me to say, although if you read them carefully, you’ll see how much I try to acknowledge, cite and build upon existing criticism and reception. I always read a lot of books — and articles, and press kits, and blog posts, and so on — before I write, and also as I’m writing, and as I’m editing.

DavidFincherMindGames_p172-173

CL: How does David Fincher stand apart from his contemporaries, and what are th qualities that define him as an artist?

AN: He’s a brilliant technician, and I think there’s a tension between his adroitness with a certain kind of imagery — sleek, cool, edgy, seductiveness—and the cautionary themes of the scripts he works with. So many of his movies are about iconcolastic confidence men in a marketplace of ideas: his serial killers and cult figureheads are all trying to promote ideology through mass media forms. Given Fincher’s background in advertising, these narratives can’t help but feel double-edged, and trying to locate the relationship between his showmanship and his worldview — where they align, where they diverge, and whether they contradict one another in helpless or productive ways — is what the book is about.

CL: Do you have a favorite David Fincher film?

AN: I think Zodiac is an almost perfectly written, directed, acted, shot, and edited movie that is then somehow more than the sum of its parts — more than almost perfect, I guess, and probably better even than a “perfect” movie insofar as its little flaws and frustrations place the brilliant bits in context. I think it’s one of the richest, densest, and most re-watchable American movies ever made.

CL: I agree completely. It might be my Fincher-favorite as well. I find that my appreciation for it only grows with each viewing, and I always see something new. I experience it differently every time that I watch it.

This new volume is structured differently than a lot of similar career-spanning volumes as most tend to discuss films in a chronological manner. Could you discuss the structure of “Mind Games,” and tell us why you decided to present the information in this manner?

AN: I experimented with a non-chronological approach in my PTA book, and thought Fincher lent himself well to a dossier approach: different tendencies and themes, enumerated and filed like a psychological profile. So those themes/topics were: procedural structure; entrapment; paranoia; an existential relationship to history and time; a satirical relationship to gender and romance. The connections go in other directions as well, of course, but this arrangement seemed to make sense and helped me elide clichés about his career. The exception to the structure was Mank, which got stuck in at the end as a kind of bookend — a way of beginning and ending in a present tense.

CL: Have any aspects of Fincher’s work changed or evolved throughout his career?

AN: He’s somehow become simultaneously speedier and more contemplative: notwithstanding the odd ricketiness of Mank, he’s a filmmaker who locates clarity in momentum. I don’t think of the early films as being especially fast no matter how intricately they were edited. Now, he just powers through everything – narrative, character development, world-building, set-ups payoffs. The sheer amount of information (and data) that is still conveyed — lucidly — by this approach strikes me as remarkable. In other ways, he’s very much the same director he was at the beginning, and the juvenile or playful elements of the first movies still work in the context of his style, but they’re also more purposeful and refined. Seven is a movie that works brilliantly in a pulp-fiction context; Gone Girl is sort of about that pulp fiction context, without sacrificing entertainment value or craftsmanship.

CL: Were there any unique challenges to covering the career of David Fincher that you didn’t face when writing about other artists?

AN: Just trying to find a language to describe such a clean, precise, lucid aesthetic, and to sidestep the clichés around his reputation — to say something that’s not simply about perfectionism, or control, or confidence, etc.

CL:  Do you have a favorite out of the books that you have written so far?

AN: I’ve never been happier than I was after finishing my first book for ECW Press, about Showgirls: that felt like a victory over something.

CL: Can readers expect similar volumes on other auteurs in the future?

AN: One can only hope.

DavidFincherMindGames_p234-235

Categories
"Making of" Classic Cinema Filmmakers

Book Interview: Guillermo Del Toro — The Iconic Filmmaker and His Work

Guillermo del Toro - The Iconic Filmmaker and his Work - Cover Artwork

Publisher: Quarto Press

Release Date: November 09, 2021

A Conversation with Ian Nathan

Ian Nathan’s wonderful “Iconic Filmmakers” series is continued with this lovely coffee table-style book about the work of Guillermo Del Toro. Those who have already discovered this wonderful series of coffee table books know that they can expect a “complete and intimate study of the life and work of one of modern cinema’s most truly unique directors, whose distinct aesthetic and imagination are unmatched in contemporary film” as Nathan “charts the progression of a career that has produced some of contemporary cinema’s most revered scenes and idiosyncratic characters. This detailed examination looks at how the strands of Del Toro’s career have woven together to create one of modern cinema’s most ground-breaking bodies of work.” The book is an excellent blend of career biography, production information, and analysis that attempts to delve into the director’s psyche. “The book starts by examining his beginnings in Mexico, the creative but isolated child surrounded by ornate Catholicism and monster magazines, filming stop motion battles between his toys on a Super-8 film camera” before following him through film school and eventually into the productions of some of cinemas most unique films.  The book is illustrated with rich and alluring production photographs, and thematic illustrations that enhance Nathan’s text. There is even an eight-page “gatefold section” that offers a career timeline.

The books author, Ian Nathan, lives and works in London as one of the UK’s best-known film writers. He is the author of nine previous books — including Anything You Can Imagine: Peter Jackson and the Making of Middle-earth, Alien VaultTerminator Vault, and the other books in his “Iconic Filmmakers” series (which includes volumes on Tim Burton, The Coen Brothers, Quentin Tarantino, and Wes Anderson). He is the former editor and executive editor of Empire, the world’s biggest movie magazine, where he remains a contributing editor. He also regularly contributes to The TimesThe IndependentThe Mail on SundayCahiers Du Cinema, and the Discovering Film documentary series on Sky Arts. Needless to say, we are honored to have an opportunity to discuss this new volume with the author.

Guillermo del Toro - The Iconic Filmmaker and his Work - Page Spread 00

CL: First of all, I would just like to thank you for sitting down to answer a few questions about this excellent series of volumes about contemporary “Iconic Filmmakers.” Let’s start at the beginning. How did you first begin your career as a writer?

IN: This is a long story. The key moment really came as a student, when I was given the entertainment desk on the university newspaper. I had always loved film, almost to an obsessive level, but the chance to express my opinion about what I had seen was transformative – it was a real road to Damascus event, I knew exactly what I wanted to do. Then a montage: local newspapers, freelance writing, getting into magazines, joining the staff of Empire (Europe’s biggest film magazine), rising within the ranks to editor. And then, years later, books…

CL: I’m curious as to who you would choose as your favorite filmmaker of all time. Who has made the biggest impression on you as a cinephile?

IN: This is so hard. I’m married to the sheer variety that cinema offers, but I’ll cheat and pick two (out of the multitudes). Billy Wilder managed to squeeze such darkness into his comedies and such life into his dramas. The Apartment is a masterpiece. And the films of the Coen brothers endlessly intrigue me. Every time I return to the likes of Miller’s Crossing or Barton Fink or Fargo, they offer something new.

CL: If the world was burning and you had a chance to save one single film, which film would you rescue from destruction?

IN: One film? Out of all of them? You are cruel. But the world is burning, so I’m going to grab Blade Runner. It has haunted me since the day I saw it in the cinema, aged 12, and I couldn’t imagine not returning to its dystopian embrace.

CL: How was the “Iconic Filmmakers” series was born, and how do you choose which filmmakers to cover for the series?

IN: Well, I had written a couple of books for the publisher, and we got into a discussion about potential books on directors. At that stage, it was picking a director I might want to write about and what might be appealing to a potential readership. Out of that came Tim Burton, and the series was underway. Each choice comes via a mix of things: my passion, a director with a cult following, and a fitting visual palate so the book will look good. (I always joke that you should be able to hang an “esque” on the end of their names: Burtonesque or Tarantinoesque.) Market forces come into play. It is always a discussion with the publisher about what might sell. If the chosen subject has a forthcoming project, so much the better.

CL:  How do the volumes in this series differ from similar books that focus on a particular filmmaker’s work?

IN: Well, the “Iconic” element of the title is important. As I mentioned, the director has to have a personality that inspires a following. It isn’t simply about successful directors. It’s about those who have reshaped the world of film, who have the capacity to surprise us, while having a very distinctive style, ready to be deciphered. You know when you’re watching a film by Quentin Tarantino, the Coens, or Wes Anderson.

CL:  Do you have a favorite out of the books that you have written so far — particularly out of those in the series?

IN: You’re asking me to choose between my children. In terms of the series, each has brought its own pleasures and challenges. It’s never easy to sum up the work of iconic directors. Out of them all, both the Wes Anderson and the Del Toro books feel like I have cracked something of the mystery. Outside of the Iconic Filmmakers series, I’m very proud of a book I wrote on Ridley Scott, plus a more recent tome, The Coppolas: A Movie Dynasty.

CL: How does Guillermo Del Toro stand apart from his contemporaries, and what are the qualities that define him as an artist?

IN: Wow, you could say I’ve written an entire book on this very subject! I’ll try and boil it down. What I love about his work is that he has become a hugely successful Hollywood filmmaker without ever relinquishing his Mexican heart. In fact, that passion and exoticism is what has allowed him to thrive. He is tuned to a more primal part of storytelling — the myths and legends on which the world turn. Fairy-tales are his medium, and he understands how they convey great meaning about the human heart. No one has used fantasy quite as he has done. While he has only made one film on home soil, he still draws deep on the Mexican mix of religion and mysticism. He is also one of the last great physical filmmakers, building sets and props and mechanical creatures to maintain that tactile richness to his creations.

CL: Do you have a favorite Del Toro film?

IN: It’s interesting. Before I begin these books, I write out my order of preference for the films of the director in question. Then once I’ve finished, I do it again to see if the order has changed. And it always does. Hellboy and Cronos moved up in my estimation, but my favourites remained the same. Depending on how I’m feeling it’s either Pan’s Labyrinth or The Devil’s Backbone. I think Del Toro might agree.

CL: Were there any unique challenges to covering the career of Guillermo Del Toro that you didn’t face when writing about other artists?

IN: The biggest challenge was sifting through the sheer volume of material that Del Toro presents to the movie archeologist. He is an extraordinary voice on his own work – like a living biography, which is thrilling. Indeed, he has discussed his films in such depth, noting the many references, that the book could have been three times the length. I say it in the book, he could have been a great critic. Interviewing him is like standing in a waterfall, but that can feel overwhelming at times. Wrestling the story into shape was tough.

CL: The book discusses a number of “unborn films” — or projects that Del Toro was forced to abandon. Which of these films would you most like to see receive a future greenlight?

IN: I know that most would opt for the curiosity of what Del Toro’s Hobbit films might have been like or the icy magnitude of his beloved Lovecraft adaptation At the Mountains of Madness, but I would choose The Left Hand of Darkness. This was Del Toro’s Mexican spin on The Count of Monte Cristo — a  hugely important book to him — that in his hands would have been transformed into a gothic Western. I’ve read the script, and while there are bizarre and wonderful steampunk elements, it stays true to the roots of its genre. And being set in the country of his birth, it would have been both epic and personal.

CL:  Do you believe that the director’s approach to creature design is different from other filmmakers? What sets his creations apart from those found in other films?

IN: I do, very much so. Given his process of storytelling begins with design, sketching out his creatures and annotating them in his fabulous, leather-bound notebooks (themselves a trove of del Toro lore), there is something highly individual about the look and feel of his creatures. They are rarely there simply to frighten us (though often they do). They possess a physicality — he avoids CGI if possible — and embody the themes of his stories. You can tell his heart is with the beasts, maybe he sees himself in them. The aquatic man of The Shape of Water is his leading man! It is the humans who are more often the true monsters.

CL: Which of the director’s iconic monsters is your personal favorite?

IN: Wow, there are so many: the insects in Mimic, the great kaiju of Pacific Rim, half the cast of Hellboy. Since you’ve cornered me, I will opt for a creature that has so much presence, he’s truly unforgettable. The Pale Man in Pan’s Labyrinth leans toward the terrifying, with his eyeballs on the plate in front of him, ready to be inserted into the palms of his hands, but del Toro also saw him as a vision of the rich and corrupt in Spain doing nothing as the masses starve. Note how he lords it over the feast, and we cross cut with the dinner table of the wealthy locals and the fascist captain.

CL: The Pale Man is my personal favorite as well. Can readers expect future volumes in the series?

IN: They certainly can. I’m not permitted to reveal too much at this stage, suffice to say that I am well underway on the next book in the series. The director in question presents very different challenges to previous subjects. I’ll give you a single word: “cerebral.” It’s always interesting how much the personality and films of the individual shapes the book in question. This book will look and feel very different to previous entries, but, boy, will it be gorgeous. Let the guessing game commence.

Guillermo del Toro - The Iconic Filmmaker and his Work - Page Spread 01

Categories
Filmmakers

Book Review: Tarantino – A Retrospective (Revised and Expanded Edition)

Tarantino - Revised Cover

Publisher: Insight Editions

Release Date: September 07, 2021

Born in Knoxville, Tennessee, in 1963, Quentin Tarantino spent many Saturday evenings during his childhood accompanying his mother to the movies, nourishing a love of film that was, over the course of his life, to become all-consuming. It is just as well, because he would grow up to be one of American cinema’s most celebrated filmmakers. Known for his highly cinematic visual style, out-of-sequence storytelling, and grandiose violence, Tarantino’s films have provoked both praise and criticism over the course of his career. They’ve also won him a host of awards — including Oscars, Golden Globes, and BAFTA awards — usually for his original screenplays. His oeuvre includes the cult classic Pulp Fiction, bloody revenge saga Kill Bill Vol. 1 and Vol. 2, and historical epics Inglorious Basterds, Django Unchained, and The Hateful Eight. This stunning retrospective catalogs each of Quentin Tarantino’s movies in detail, from My Best Friend’s Birthday to The Hateful Eight. The book is a tribute to a unique directing and writing talent, celebrating an uncompromising, passionate director’s enthralling career at the heart of cult filmmaking.

Quentin Tarantino

Make no mistake about this, Tarantino: A Retrospective isn’t merely coffee-table fluff with a lot of great photographs and artwork (although, there are plenty of great photos to be found throughout the book). This is an informative examination of the director’s career. Tom Shone’s text is a seamless mixture of career biography, retrospective appreciation, and film criticism. Surprisingly, there aren’t many essential books available about the director. This makes Shone’s text all the more essential for those who love the director’s work. In our review of the original edition, we mentioned that some might feel that the text was slightly premature since Tarantino has consistently insisted that he will only make ten films before he retires from making movies. It seemed a shame that his final two films were inevitably left out of the retrospective.

Well, this new edition of the book tries to rectify this one issue slightly by adding a sixteen page chapter that covers Once Upon A Time in Hollywood and a slightly different epilogue that is slightly updated from the 2017 edition. Everything else about the book is exactly the same, so it may not be worth the money to purchase this new edition if you already own the first edition. Having said this, those who do not yet own either edition of the book will want to pick up this “Revised and Expanded Edition.”

Tarantino - Revised Edition - Open

Categories
Filmmakers

Book Review: The Nolan Variations

The Nolan Variations - Cover

Publisher: Penguin / Random House

Release Date: November 03, 2020

Imagine a college course on the cinema of Christopher Nolan. Tom Shone’s The Nolan Variations: The Movies Mysteries, and Marvels of Christopher Nolan would be the textbook. This beautifully rendered comprehensive examination of the director’s work is the most complete text on the subject to date, and it has benefited from the cooperation of Nolan himself. He has written a book that outclasses his incredible career-spanning texts on Quentin Tarantino and Martin Scorsese (Tarantino: A Retrospective and Martin Scorsese: A Retrospective, and he takes a different approach to this volume in that he doesn’t present the information in a strictly chronological manner but is organized instead by thirteen themes and motifs (each constituting a chapter of the book): Structure, Orientation, Time, Perception, Space, Illusion, Chaos, Dreams, Revolution, Emotion, Survival, Knowledge, and Endings. Nolan fans will welcome and cherish this extensive volume as it will certainly embellish their knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of Nolan’s work. Highly Recommended.

Categories
Classic Cinema Filmmakers

Book Review: Wes Anderson – The Iconic Filmmaker and His Work

Wes Anderson - Cover

Publisher: Quarto Press

Release Date: November 03, 2020

This reviewer is fast becoming a fan of Ian Nathan’s wonderful series of books on various modern auteurs of the cinema. His books on Quentin Tarantino and the Coen brothers were both enthusiastically received, and I found that “Alien Vault” was well worth reading as well. The truth is that it is Nathan’s name that captured my attention when I learned about this beautiful book about Wes Anderson. I’ve never been a huge Wes Anderson fan (although I do greatly admire three of his films), but Nathan’s thoughtful examination of his filmography has certainly given me a new appreciation for his aesthetic.

Wes Anderson - Slipcase and Book

Wes Anderson - Centerfold

Wes Anderson - Spread 01

Wes Anderson - Spread 02

Those who are already enthusiastic about the director’s work will find even more to love about this excellent career spanning volume as Anderson’s themes, motifs, and narratives are discussed in some depth and put into context. There is an individual chapter devoted to each of his feature films, and this includes The French Dispatch (which hasn’t even been released yet). It’s safe to say that this is an essential text for Wes Anderson cultists.

Categories
Filmmakers

Book Review: Paul Thomas Anderson — Masterworks

Distributor: Abrams Books

Release Date: October 20, 2020

Adam Nayman’s (author of The Coen Brothers: This Book Really Ties the Films Together) career spanning examination of Paul Thomas Anderson’s filmography is one of only two books about the director’s work and the only comprehensive text that covers each of his films to date. Each of the director’s eight films is discussed and examined in some detail, but Nayman organizes his book quite differently than similar books. Instead of examining Anderson’s work in chronological order, he presents his essays in the order of the era that each of his movies are set (with the notable exception of Phantom Thread): There Will Be Blood, The Master, Inherent Vice, Boogie Nights, Hard Eight, Magnolia, Punch Drunk Love, and Phantom Thread. Anderson’s influences, his style, and the recurring themes of alienation, reinvention, ambition, and destiny that course through his movies are analyzed in enough detail to add enormously to the reader’s appreciation of these films.

This would be more than enough to warrant our enthusiasm for this volume, but Nayman also includes a selection of interviews with seven of Anderson’s closest collaborators — including JoAnne Sellar (producer), Dylan Tichenor (editor), Robert Elswit (cinematographer), Jonny Greenwood (composer), Jack Fisk (production designer), Mark Bridges (costume designer), and Vicky Krieps (actor) — and illuminated by film stills, archival photos, original illustrations, and an appropriately psychedelic design aesthetic. It’s a wonderful gift for anyone who admires the Anderson’s work and may very well earn him a few new fans.

Categories
Classic Cinema Filmmakers

Book Review: Stanley Kubrick – New York Jewish Intellectual

Publisher: Rutgers University Press

Release Date: April 19, 2018

Quite a lot has been written about Stanley Kubrick, but it isn’t often that a text offers cinephiles a truly new prism in which to view his filmography. Stanley Kubrick: New York Jewish Intellectual reexamines the director’s work in context of his ethnic and cultural origins. Many reviews of this text are suggesting that the book answers a single question: “Just how Jewish was Stanley Kubrick?” However, this seems to be missing the point. Nathan Abrams merely dissects each of the director’s films in an effort to examine how Jewish elements made their way into his filmography. Each chapter offers a detailed analysis of one of Kubrick’s major films, including LolitaDr. Strangelove2001A Clockwork OrangeBarry LyndonThe ShiningFull Metal Jacket, and Eyes Wide ShutStanley Kubrick thus presents an illuminating look at one of the twentieth century’s most renowned and yet misunderstood directors. The analysis of each film is quite exhaustive. In fact, some points can occasionally feel strained as if Abrams overreaching, but this isn’t a problem since any unique examination of Kubrick’s work can only enrich the reader’s appreciation and understanding of the films being discussed. Stanley Kubrick fans should certainly find a place of honor on their book shelves for this always engaging text.

Categories
Classic Cinema Filmmakers

Book Review: Stanley Kubrick – American Filmmaker (Jewish Lives)

Stanley Kubrick - American Filmmaker - Cover

Publisher: Yale University Press

Release Date: August 18, 2020

Kubrick enthusiasts will be wondering how this new volume compares to John Baxter’s biography (which was approximately 360 pages in length if one doesn’t count the book’s various appendages) and Vincent Lobrutto’s examination of the director’s life (which was a healthy 500 pages in length if one discounts the appendages). This new text by David Mikics is less comprehensive in many ways (it is only 204 pages) but examines Stanley Kubrick’s life through a different lens than the two previous tomes.

Stanley Kubrick: American Filmmaker is part of a “prizewinning series of interpretative biography designed to explore the many facets of Jewish identity. Individual volumes illuminate the imprint of Jewish figures upon literature, religion, philosophy, politics, cultural and economic life, and the arts and sciences.” David Mikics draws from interviews and new archival material to examine the enigmatic director’s life and how it influenced his work. He puts forth the theory that “Kubrick’s Jewishness played a crucial role in his idea of himself as an outsider.” His life and work is examined in this particular context, and this alternative approach to the subject has resulted in a book that will earn its place in Kubrickian scholarship even if one expects Mikics to examine this angle more than he does. It certainly makes a terrific introductory primer on the director’s life and work.

Categories
Alfred Hitchcock Classic Cinema Filmmakers

Book Interview: Hitchcock’s California – Vista Visions from the Camera Eye

Alfred Hitchcock Master

Hitchcock's California (Small Cropped)

Publisher: Middlebrow Books

Release Date: March 29, 2020 (Tentative)

Robert Jones (Small) Robert Jones

A Conversation with Robert Jones

Hitchcock’s California: Vista Visions from the Camera Eye” celebrates (and re-creates) images that evoke scenes from many of the great director’s most famous films—including Notorious, Vertigo, North by Northwest, Psycho, The Birds, and a great many more classics. It was a labor of love for Robert Jones (the book’s primary creator) and a treat for Alfred Hitchcock’s fans. Jones’s excellent location photography is supplemented by photographs created by Aimee Sinclair that re-create memorable scenes from “Hitch’s” greatest movies and commentary by Dan Auiler (author of “Vertigo: The Making of a Hitchcock Classic” and “Hitchcock’s Notebooks“).

Alfred Hitchcock Master is honored to have had the opportunity to talk to Robert Jones, Aimee Sinclair, and Dan Auiler about their incredible new book:

AHM: How…

View original post 6,133 more words

Categories
"Making of" Directing Filmmakers

Book Review: My Best Friend’s Birthday – The Making of a Quentin Tarantino Film

MBFB Cover

Publisher: BearManor Media

Release Date: October 06, 2019

My Best Friend’s Birthday: The Making of a Quentin Tarantino Film is a book that few expected. The film discussed wasn’t even completed, and most books on the director relegate this abandoned effort to a mere footnote. Andrew J. Rausch hopes to remedy this unfortunate tendency amongst Tarantino scholars. The writer interviewed a great many of those who worked on the project—including Tarantino himself—and presents these textual interview snippets in an order that traces how each of these people came together, other early film projects they worked on, and how they ended up making (or trying to make) a black-and-white screwball comedy. The final section of the book is a breakdown of the film as it would have been if it had been completed. He also makes the argument that My Best Friend’s Birthday is something far more meaningful than a curiosity. After all, the film’s production was a formative experience in Tarantino’s life. It helped shape his voice and prepared him for bigger and better projects. If the book has a weakness, it is that the “oral history” nature of the text results in a book that is sometimes slightly repetitive. However, one imagines that scholars and fans will be thrilled to have this information available to them as it offers a relatively detailed account of a part of Tarantino’s history that has been largely reduced to mere trivia until now.